In 2009 we started an internal ToP of the CoPs scheme where each month we would look at a particular topic and at the end of the year we asked for a written nomination from each community why they should be the CoP of the Year.
This went down really well, and when other communities from across Communities of Practice for Public Service heard about it they asked “can we enter it next year”.
So 2011 see’s the second CoP of the Year Awards. And what a fight that went on.
We broke it down into three award categories again
- innovation and creativity
- efficiency through collaboration
- effective facilitation team
And the overall winner was selected from the winners of three categories.
The votes for CoP of the Year went down to the wire with split decisions from our esteemed panel of judges. This was no X-Factor but still the excitement was there.
So the winners for 2011 are:
Innovation and creativity
Winner: Child Poverty
Efficiency through collaboration
Winner: Workforce Matters
Effective facilitation team
Overall CoP of the Year Award
Winner: Workforce Matters
If you would like to see the winning application you can view them here (sign in required)
It seems the term “community of practice” is getting thrown around more and more as a solution to everything.
Jon Harman from Syngenta has a great quote “Communities of Practically Everything.” And this really explains it.
But the question is why do some communities succeed where others fail?
If you take the Knowledge Management way of looking at things e.g. People, Process, Technology, this might help explain it.
The main problem is that when a Community of Practice is set up it’s normally done in the reverse order.
Technology, Process, People.
We already have the technology with the Communities of Practice for Public Service.
We already have the process, with the Help function and the Facilitators Community
But we lack in the People side. It’s not just about attracting numbers of people to join the community, it’s about encouraging interaction and making them want to come back for more.
And this is all about good facilitation.
So if the Batteries are Not included. What battery would describe the Facilitation Team in your Community?
Home brand –Lot of effort at the start to bring the community together but fades away quickly after
Alkaline – Able to bring the community together, but just as its starting to go somewhere the energy runs out.
Energiser – Consistent power over a prolonged period of time. Encourages the group dynamics, interactions and progress with objectives of the community. Also plans to replace the batteries when the power is starting to wain.